State v. M. C.
Supreme Court of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
SHERAN, Chief Justice.
After her acquittal on two counts of first-degree murder, appellant M. C.1 made a motion for expungement of criminal records nearly identical to the motions we discussed at length in State v. C. A., 304 N.W.2d 353 (Minn.1981). The motion here was granted in part and denied in part. We find that the trial court should in all respects be affirmed, given the record of this case and the manner in which appellant formulated her motions.
Pursuant to Minn.Stat. § 299C.11 (1980)2 and the inherent power of the court, appellant moved the court for an order encompassing the…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- State v. C. A.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1981
- State v. R. L. F.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1977
3Cited by9 opinions
- State v. AmbayeSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2000
- State v. L.K.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1984
- State v. M.B.M.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1994
- State v. N.G.K.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 2009
- State v. AmbayeSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2000
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.