Koch v. Otis Elevator Co.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the CourtBebgan, J.
Defendant Otis Elevator Company undertook by written agreement with the Emerson School to service an automatic elevator in premises 12 East 96th Street. The agreement required defendant to ‘ ‘ use all reasonable care to maintain the elevator[s] in proper and .safe operating condition ” and to “ regularly and systematically examine, adjust, lubricate as required, and if, in our judgment, conditions warrant, repair or replace ’ ’ certain enumerated parts.
Plaintiff was the superintendent of the building in the employ of Emerson School and lived in the premises. On the evening of June 22, 1954…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- George Foltis, Inc. v. City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1941
- Kelly v. Watson Elevator Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1955
- Manley v. New York Telephone Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1951
- Beinhocker v. Barnes Dev., Staley Elev.New York Court of Appeals · 1947
- Ames v. Watson Elevator Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1951
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- Evans v. Otis Elevator Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1961
- Burgess v. Otis Elevator Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1985
- Margaret Davlan v. Otis Elevator CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1987
- American Elevator Co. v. BriscoeNevada Supreme Court · 1977
- Birdsall v. Montgomery Ward & Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1985
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.