Legal Opinion

State v. Johnson

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided April 4, 2006No. COA05-758PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

JOHN, Judge.

Defendant appeals the trial court’s denial of his motion to suppress evidence seized pursuant to a search of his motor vehicle. Defendant argues, inter alia; the search was unconstitutional because it exceeded the reasonable scope of any valid consent and therefore constituted a warrantless search without probable cause. We agree.

On 13 August 2003, Detective Steven Ray Lovin (Lovin) of the Robeson County Sheriffs Department stopped defendant’s Plymouth Voyager van because the license plate was partially obscured. Detaining defendant in his patrol vehicle, Lovin wrote a warning…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Schneckloth v. BustamonteSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  2. United States v. RossSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  3. Florida v. JimenoSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  4. United States v. Carlos Garcia and Jose Luis GarciaCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1990
  5. United States v. Walter George Strickland, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1990

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. State v. HaginCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2010
  2. State v. SchiroCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2012
  3. State v. NealCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2008
  4. State v. StoneCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2006
  5. State v. StoneCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2006

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API