Standard Oil Co. of California v. Agsalud
District Court, N.D. California
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OF OPINION
RENFREW, District Judge.
This case presents two important issues, whether the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 (“ERISA”), 29 U.S.C. §§ 1001-1381, preempts Hawaii’s health insurance laws and, if it does, whether it is constitutional.
I
ERISA regulates the administration of private employee benefit and pension plans affecting interstate commerce. Pursuant to its authority under the Commerce Clause, U.S.Const. art. I § 8, Congress established standards concerning disclosure to plan participants, reporting to the federal government, vesting of benefits, funding of…
2Cases cited37 opinions
- Dandridge v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- McGowan v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
- Udall v. TallmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- Hines v. DavidowitzSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
- Rice v. Santa Fe Elevator Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1947
32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by44 opinions
- Richardson v. City and County of HonoluluHawaii Supreme Court · 1994
- Golden Gate Restaurant Ass'n v. City & County of San FranciscoCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008
- Martori Bros. Distributors v. James-MassengaleCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1986
- Lukus v. Westinghouse Electric Corp.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1980
- Stone v. StoneDistrict Court, N.D. California · 1978
39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.