Legal Opinion

Thomson v. Texas & Pacific Railway Co.

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided April 8, 1957No. 321PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Per curiam

We hold that the *927proofs justified with reason the jury’s conclusion that employer negligence played a part in producing the petitioner’s injury. Rogers v. Missouri Pacific R. Co., 352 U. S. 500; Webb v. Illinois Central R. Co., 352 U. S. 512; Ferguson v. Moore-McCormack Lines, 352 U. S. 521. The judgment of the Court of Appeals is reversed and the case is remanded. Mr. Justice Frankfurter would dismiss the writ as improvidently granted. See his dissent in Rogers v. Missouri Pacific R. Co., 352 U. S. 500, 524. Mr. Justice Harlan and Mr. Justice Whit-taker dissent for the reasons given in Mr.…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Rogers v. Missouri Pacific RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  2. Ferguson v. Moore-McCormack Lines, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1957
  3. Webb v. Illinois Central RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1957

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. Arnold v. Panhandle & Santa Fe Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1957
  2. Gibson v. ThompsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  3. Ferguson v. St. Louis-San Francisco Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1958
  4. Moore v. Terminal Railroad Assn. of St. LouisSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
  5. Anthony S. Pehowic v. Erie Lackawanna Railroad CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1970

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API