Legal Opinion
Raiola v. Los Angeles First National Trust & Savings Bank
City of New York Municipal Court
Decided February 25, 1929PublishedCited by 18 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtNoonan, J.
The defendant appears specially and moves to vacate the service of the summons upon the defendant. The summons was served in the city of New York, borough of Manhattan, upon one Paul K. Yost, who at the time of service was admittedly a vice-president of the defendant bank. The defendant is a National bank created under the laws of the United States, with its principal place oí business in Los Angeles, Cal. The action is on a draft drawn on the defendant in favor of the plaintiff by one J. F. Walton, who was the holder of a letter of credit issued by the defendant. The motion is based on two…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Tauza v. . Susquehanna Coal Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1917
- Green v. Chicago, Burlington & Quincy Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1907
- First Nat. Bank of Charlotte v. MorganSupreme Court of the United States · 1889
- Bank of America v. Whitney Central National BankSupreme Court of the United States · 1923
- Bank of Bethel v. Pahquioque BankSupreme Court of the United States · 1872
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Mercantile Nat. Bank at Dallas v. LangdeauSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Leonardi v. Chase Nat. Bank of City of New YorkCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1936
- Michigan National Bank v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1972
- Wachovia Bank, National Association v. Daniel G. Schmidt III Priag LLC Dgs Investments, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2004
- Lapinsohn v. Lewis Charles, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1968
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.