Legal Opinion
Jaskow v. Harriman National Bank & Trust Co.
New York Supreme Court
Decided February 28, 1935PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtDore, J.
Plaintiff sues to recover the sum of $3,030, with interest from July 1, 1931, as damages by reason of his purchase of two shares of the stock of the Harriman National Bank and Trust Company from the defendant (hereinafter referred to as “ the bank ”), claiming such purchase has been induced by false representations claimed to have been made on the part of the bank by John A. Noble, a vice-president. The action was commenced against the bank and Noble. Noble died before the trial and the action was not revived against his estate.
I find that the stock was purchased by plaintiff in the belief…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Merchants' Bank v. State BankSupreme Court of the United States · 1871
- Lantry v. WallaceSupreme Court of the United States · 1901
- Alexander v. . CauldwellNew York Court of Appeals · 1881
- Singleton v. HarrimanNew York Supreme Court · 1933
- Singleton v. HarrimanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1934
3Cited by4 opinions
- Madison National Bank v. LipinMichigan Court of Appeals · 1975
- Houston v. DrakeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1938
- Goess v. Lucinda Shops, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1937
- Heitman v. HarrimanDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1936