Legal Opinion
State ex rel. Boney v. Central Mutual Insurance Co. of Chicago
Supreme Court of North Carolina
Decided May 25, 1938PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtBarnhill, J.
"Wliile tbe Insurance Company denied liability and declined to investigate tbe claims against tbe insured, or to defend tbe actions instituted thereon, and tbe receiver disallowed tbe claim upon tbe contention that no valid contract existed between tbe Central Mutual Insurance Company of Chicago and Tbomas-Howard Company, it is now agreed that there was a valid and subsisting binder and policy of insurance issued by tbe defendant Insurance Company. It is also agreed as to tbe amounts paid out by tbe agency in behalf of tbe insured in settlement of claims against it, which were covered by tbe…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Elam v. Smithdeal Realty & InsuranceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1921
- Journal Publishing Co. v. BarberSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1914
- Davison v. Gregory.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1903
- Moring v. . PrivottSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1908
- Sanders v. . SandersSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1832
3Cited by12 opinions
- Hill v. Cross Country Settlement, LLCCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2007
- Elam v. . Realty Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1921
- Jamestown Mut. Ins. Co. v. Nationwide Mut. Ins. Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1970
- North Carolina Insurance Guaranty Ass'n v. Century Indemnity Co.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1994
- United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. ElamTennessee Supreme Court · 1955
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.