Legal Opinion

West Bend Mutual Insurance v. Higgins

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided March 27, 2009No. 5D08-2987PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGriffin, J.

In this first-party bad faith action brought pursuant to section 624.155, Florida Statutes (2007), Petitioner insurer seeks certiorari review of an order of the trial court granting Respondent claimants discovery of certain documents that insurer claims are protected by attorney-client privilege. We deny in part and grant in part the petition for writ of certiorari. As we will briefly discuss below, we conclude that nothing in Allstate Indemnity Co. v. Ruiz, 899 So.2d 1121 (Fla.2005), eliminates the attorney-client privilege in first-party insurance eases where the plaintiff asserts statutory…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Hickman v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
  2. Haines v. Liggett Group Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1992
  3. Allstate Indem. Co. v. RuizSupreme Court of Florida · 2005
  4. American Tobacco Co. v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1997
  5. XL SPECIALTY INS. v. Aircraft HoldingsDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2006

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Genovese v. Provident Life & Accident Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Florida · 2011
  2. State Farm Florida Insurance Co. v. PuigDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2011
  3. Higgins v. West Bend Mutual InsuranceDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2012
  4. Acevedo v. Doctors Hospital, Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 2011
  5. Boozer v. StalleyDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2014

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API