Legal Opinion

United States v. Insurance Companies

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided March 22, 1875No. 315PublishedCited by 28 opinions

Appeals from the Court of Claims. The Home Insurance Company and the Southern Insurance and Trust Company, both being corporations created by the legislature of Georgia iii 1861 and 1863, while the State was in armed rebellion against the government of the United States, brought suit in the court below against the United States, under the Captured and Abandoned Property Act (an act which, by its terms, gives a right to sue only to persons who have borne true faith and…

Read the full summary

Appeals from the Court of Claims. The Home Insurance Company and the Southern Insurance and Trust Company, both being corporations created by the legislature of Georgia iii 1861 and 1863, while the State was in armed rebellion against the government of the United States, brought suit in the court below against the United States, under the Captured and Abandoned Property Act (an act which, by its terms, gives a right to sue only to persons who have borne true faith and allegiance to the government and have never voluntarily aided, abetted, or given encouragement to rebellion), to recover the…

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Strong

It may well be doubted whether under the pleadings in the court below the appellants have any right to raise the objection here that the companies plaintiff have now no legal existence, because incorporated after the attempted secession of Georgia from the Union, and before the close of the war. There was no plea that traversed directly the corporate existence of the plaintiffs. A general denial of the averments of the petition was hardly sufficient. Notwithstanding the old rule that a corporation suiug must pi’ove its corporate existence, it has been many times decided that a plea of the…

2Cited by28 opinions

  1. S. Kadic, on Her Own Behalf and on Behalf of Her Infant Sons Benjamin and Ognjen, Internationalna Iniciativa Zena Bosne I Hercegovine "Biser," and Zene Bosne I Hercegovine v. Radovan Karadzic, Jane Doe I, on Behalf of Herself and All Others Similarly Situated and Jane Doe Ii, on Behalf of Herself and as Administratrix of the Estate of Her Deceased Mother, and on Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated v. Radovan KaradzicCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1996
  2. Kadic v. KaradžićCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1995
  3. Sokoloff v. National City BankNew York Court of Appeals · 1924
  4. Transportes Aereos De Angola v. Ronair, Inc.District Court, D. Delaware · 1982
  5. Federal Republic of Germany v. ElicofonDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1972

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API