Legal Opinion

Conrad v. Conrad

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided September 16, 1969No. 42680PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

McINERNEY, Justice.

This appeal presents the question of whether, under the circumstances presented here, the wife is entitled to receive alimony based on the husband’s future earning capacity. The sufficiency of the attorney fee allowed by the trial court is also challenged.

The parties were married on April 19, 1961. A divorce action was instituted by E. C. Conrad, as plaintiff, on December 12, 1966. The decree rendered on December 22, 1966, pursuant to a waiver filed by Helen Conrad, defendant, and an agreed property settlement, was vacated, after an extensive hearing, on January 16, 1967.…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Roberts v. RobertsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1960
  2. Bishop v. BishopSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1944
  3. McCoy v. McCoySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1967
  4. Mathews v. MathewsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1939
  5. Henley v. HenleySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1967

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Diment v. DimentCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 1974
  2. Agent v. AgentCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 1980
  3. Bowman v. BowmanCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 1981
  4. Jackson v. JacksonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1999

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API