Vorbeck v. Schnicker
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
FLOYD R. GIBSON, Senior Circuit Judge.
The St. Louis Police Officers Association and several individual members of the St. Louis Police Department (appellants) brought this action for injunctive and declaratory relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 and 28 U.S.C. § 2201 et seq., alleging that certain provisions of the personnel regulations of the St. Louis Police Department are unconstitutional.
None of the individual plaintiffs has been disciplined under the regulations in question. They sue on the basis that the regulations are vague and overbroad and that they unnecessarily chill the officers’…
2Cases cited30 opinions
- Broadrick v. OklahomaSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Connally v. General Construction Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1926
- Aetna Life Insurance v. HaworthSupreme Court of the United States · 1937
- Steffel v. ThompsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Maryland Casualty Co. v. Pacific Coal & Oil Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1941
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by56 opinions
- Martin v. SargentCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1985
- Busby v. City of OrlandoCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1991
- Martin v. SargentCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1985
- Flanagan v. MungerCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1989
- Kevin Tindle v. Lou Caudell, Individually and in His Capacity as Chief of Police for the City of Little Rock City of Little Rock, ArkansasCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1995
51 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.