Legal Opinion

Bannister v. United States Parole Commission

District Court, District of Columbia

Decided January 7, 2020No. Civil Action No. 2018-1397Published

1Opinion of the Court

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA _________________________________________ ) MARKIST BANNISTER, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) Case No. 18-cv-01397 (APM) ) UNITED STATES PAROLE COMMISSION, ) et al., ) ) Defendants. ) _________________________________________ ) MEMORANDUM OPINION I. Plaintiff Markist Bannister is a federal prisoner with intellectual disabilities who suffers from severe paranoid schizophrenia. He alleges that Defendant United States Parole Commission (“Commission”) has failed to establish procedures providing reasonable accommodations to prisoners with mental…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Lujan v. National Wildlife FederationSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
  4. Norton v. Southern Utah Wilderness AllianceSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
  5. Southeastern Community College v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1979

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API