Legal Opinion

United States v. John Morrison

Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit

Decided November 9, 2016No. 15-3589 & 15-3601PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

FLAUM, Circuit Judge.

Defendants-appellants John Morrison and Anna Novak both pled guilty to distributing a controlled substance analog and to tax fraud. The district court accepted their guilty pleas and later sentenced Morrison to forty-eight months of incarceration and Novak to ninety-six months. They now appeal, challenging the constitutionality of the Controlled Substances Analogue Act, 21 U.S.C. § 813 (the Analogue Act), the district court’s acceptance of their guilty pleas, and their sentences. We affirm.

I. Background

From approximately November 2009 through September 2013, Morrison, and…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. McFadden v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2015
  2. United States v. James P. LedonneCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1994
  3. United States v. James R. TurcotteCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2005
  4. United States v. Susan P. RobinsonCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1994
  5. United States v. Vincent Adams, Robert D. Petty, Jr., Tracy T. Fitzgerald, Charmin Banks and Gregory HayesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1997

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. United States v. Albert DowthardCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2020
  2. United States v. EdwardsCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2017
  3. United States v. RequenaCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2020
  4. Commonwealth v. HermanSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2017
  5. United States v. Adam SprengerCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2021

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API