Legal Opinion · Concurrence

Goodman v. Ancient Order of United Workmen

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided October 31, 1941No. 32,899PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Concurrence

I concur in the result because the issue is one of fact and there is enough of evidence and inference to sustain the decision below. It is therefore respectfully submitted that presumptions need not be used to support affirmance. If resort to them were necessary, we should have to consider whether the presumption of jurisdiction has higher standing and greater weight than the ordinary rebuttable presumption so as to make it go further against evidence than the ordinary presumption considered in Ryan v. Metropolitan L. Ins. Co. 206 Minn. 562,289 N.W. 557. Here there was no evidence against the…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Ryan v. Metropolitan Life Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1939

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Goodman v. Ancient Order of United WorkmenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1941

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API