A & M OIL, INC. v. Miller
Court of Appeals of Kansas
1Opinion of the Court
Briscoe, J.:
Plaintiffs, A & M Oil, Inc., and A & M Leasing (hereinafter A & M), filed a declaratory judgment action asking the trial court to determine A & M’s interest in oil and gas leases obtained from the defendants, Francis and Joseph Cadoret, d/b/a Cadoret Oil Company, Douglas and Barbara Cunningham, and John and Cheri Wiehl (hereinafter landowners). The trial court concluded that A & M had commenced drilling operations within the one-year term of the leases, thereby extending the leases under the drilling operations clause contained in each lease.
The landowners contend the trial court…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Jackson v. FarmerSupreme Court of Kansas · 1979
- Shoup v. First National BankSupreme Court of Kansas · 1937
- Hennig v. Wichita Natural Gas Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1917
- Phillips v. BergSupreme Court of Kansas · 1926
- Herl v. LegleiterCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 1983
3Cited by6 opinions
- Hall v. JFW, INC.Court of Appeals of Kansas · 1995
- Richardson v. Northwest Central Pipeline Corp.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1987
- Petroleum Energy, Inc. v. Mid-America Petroleum, Inc.District Court, D. Kansas · 1991
- Neuhard v. Range Resources-Appalachia, LLCDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 2014
- LAWSON v. CITIZEN ENERGY IICourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 2020
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.