Legal Opinion

A & M OIL, INC. v. Miller

Court of Appeals of Kansas

Decided April 3, 1986No. 57,948PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Briscoe, J.:

Plaintiffs, A & M Oil, Inc., and A & M Leasing (hereinafter A & M), filed a declaratory judgment action asking the trial court to determine A & M’s interest in oil and gas leases obtained from the defendants, Francis and Joseph Cadoret, d/b/a Cadoret Oil Company, Douglas and Barbara Cunningham, and John and Cheri Wiehl (hereinafter landowners). The trial court concluded that A & M had commenced drilling operations within the one-year term of the leases, thereby extending the leases under the drilling operations clause contained in each lease.

The landowners contend the trial court…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Jackson v. FarmerSupreme Court of Kansas · 1979
  2. Shoup v. First National BankSupreme Court of Kansas · 1937
  3. Hennig v. Wichita Natural Gas Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1917
  4. Phillips v. BergSupreme Court of Kansas · 1926
  5. Herl v. LegleiterCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 1983

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Hall v. JFW, INC.Court of Appeals of Kansas · 1995
  2. Richardson v. Northwest Central Pipeline Corp.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1987
  3. Petroleum Energy, Inc. v. Mid-America Petroleum, Inc.District Court, D. Kansas · 1991
  4. Neuhard v. Range Resources-Appalachia, LLCDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 2014
  5. LAWSON v. CITIZEN ENERGY IICourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 2020

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API