Legal Opinion

Cruz v. City of Culver City

California Court of Appeal

Decided July 15, 2016No. B265690PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

RUBIN, J.

—Plaintiffs Paula Cruz and four of her neighbors appeal from the order dismissing as an anti-SLAPP action their complaint against the City Council of the City of Culver City (the council) and five of its council members for allegedly violating the state’s open meeting laws. We reject plaintiffs’ contentions that the action is exempt from the anti-SLAPP provisions because it concerned the public interest, and affirm because there is no probability plaintiffs will prevail on the merits.

FACTS AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY

Culver City residents Paula Cruz, Ronald Davis, John Heyl, James…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Soukup v. Law Offices of Herbert HafifCalifornia Supreme Court · 2006
  2. Club Members for an Honest Election v. Sierra ClubCalifornia Supreme Court · 2008
  3. Cabral v. MartinsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2009
  4. People ex rel. Fire Insurance Exchange v. AnapolCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2012
  5. Tourgeman v. Nelson & KennardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2014

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. San Diegans for Open Gov't v. San Diego State Univ. Research Found., California Court of Appeal, 5th District2017
  2. TransparentGov Novato v. City of Novato, California Court of Appeal, 5th District2019
  3. Byrne v. RuleCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2025
  4. San Diegans for Open Government v. San Diego StateCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2017
  5. San Diegans for Open Government v. San Diego StateCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2017

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API