Legal Opinion

Steinway Building Co. v. Paxinos

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided January 29, 1932PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCarswell, J.

The plaintiff, Steinway Building Co., Inc., owns a parcel of real property in Astoria. It contains several stores. One has been leased since 1919 to defendant Brocoum. In it he has *397operated a confectionery store. On May 1, 1926, an adjoining store in the same parcel was leased to defendant Paxinos for use as a restaurant. The lease contained a provision reading:

“ 23rd. It is further agreed between the parties hereto that the landlord will not rent or permit the use of any portion of the corner plot of the premises hereby let form a part, [sfc] for a restaurant, coffee pot, cafeteria or lunch…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Halsted v. Globe Indemnity Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1932
  2. Hayes v. . NourseNew York Court of Appeals · 1887
  3. Waldorf-Astoria Segar Co. v. SalomonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1905
  4. Peoples Trust Co. v. Schultz Novelty & Sporting Goods Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1926
  5. Waldorf-Astoria Segar Company v. . SalomonNew York Court of Appeals · 1906

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Fairview Hardware, Inc. v. StrausmanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1959
  2. Newmark v. Thoens & Flaunlacher, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1934

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API