Legal Opinion

Town of North Hempstead v. White

New York Supreme Court

Decided July 13, 1955PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHogan, J.

Defendant moves for summary judgment, pursuant to rule 113 of the Rules of Civil Practice, dismissing the complaints of plaintiffs in both actions and granting judgment to him on his affirmative defenses and counterclaims which seek to restrain plaintiffs from interfering with what he claims to be a legal nonconforming use of his premises, as well as a judgment declaring the zoning ordinance unconstitutional and void insofar as it affects his property. The principal facts are undisputed.

Defendant, a dentist, purchased a residence on Rolling Hill Road, Manhasset, in 1946, thereafter engaging…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Surace v. DannaNew York Court of Appeals · 1928
  2. Brous v. SmithNew York Court of Appeals · 1952
  3. Armitage v. Board of EducationNew York Supreme Court · 1924
  4. Finnegan v. CohenNew York Supreme Court · 1941
  5. Finnegan v. CohenAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1941

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Kurlander v. Incorporated Village of HempsteadNew York Supreme Court · 1961
  2. Town of North Hempstead v. WhiteAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1956

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API