Legal Opinion

Van Dolsen v. State

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided April 1, 1891No. 399PublishedCited by 7 opinions

From the Huntington Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the Court

Black, C,. J.

Indictment under section 1991, R. S. 1881, charging that the appellant, a married man having a wife living, and a certain unmarried woman, during a specified period, did live and cohabit together in a state of fornication.

Counsel for appellant, in argument, objects to certain instructions given to the jury. The court’s instructions, with certain instructions asked by the State, are set out in a bill of exceptions, in which, following the instructions, it is stated that, “these were all the instructions given in the cause, and the ones offered by the State that were given to *109the…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Hollingsworth v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1887
  2. Leverich v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1886
  3. Jackson v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1888
  4. Behymer v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1884
  5. Delhaney v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1888

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Warner v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1931
  2. Butler v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1945
  3. State v. GiesekeSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1914
  4. Campbell v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 1891
  5. Baker v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 1891

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API