Dyer v. Hall
Indiana Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
MAY, Judge.
The plaintiffs John Dyer, David White, and Maurice Dillender (collectively "the Landowners") own land on the Ohio River. They asked for an injunction and damages, claiming boat docks owned by James Hall and the Nu-Plaza Yacht Club (collectively "Hall") extend in front of their lots and interfere with their use of the river. The trial court granted summary judgment for Hall, finding the Landowners riparian rights do not extend beyond the river's low water mark and the docks did not interfere with their use of the river. The Landowners raise eight allegations of error, which…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Bader v. JohnsonIndiana Supreme Court · 2000
- Rice v. RuddimanMichigan Supreme Court · 1862
- Dunaway v. Allstate Insurance Co.Indiana Court of Appeals · 2004
- Hawke v. MausIndiana Court of Appeals · 1967
- Bainbridge v. SherlockIndiana Supreme Court · 1868
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- KA v. City of IndianapolisIndiana Court of Appeals · 2011
- Garrett Norman v. HNTB CorporationIndiana Court of Appeals · 2025