Legal Opinion

Henkel v. Boudreau

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided September 26, 1913No. 17,242PublishedCited by 1 opinion

Appeal from the district court for Franklin county: Harry S. Dungan, Judge.

1Opinion of the CourtFawcett, J.

The substance of the petition is that on January 14, 3908, plaintiff, then a man 48 years of a.ge, by occupation a farmer, was in good health and successful in his occupation and business, from which he received annually the sum of $1,000 and upwards; that the defendants William Boudreau and Leonel Boudreau were then engaged in the *339licensed sale of intoxicating liquors; that the defendant United States Fidelity & Guaranty Company is a bond and surety company; that for the purpose of securing licenses for engaging in said liquor business the company executed its bonds for said defendants; that…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Curtin v. AtkinsonNebraska Supreme Court · 1893
  2. Buckmaster v. McElroyNebraska Supreme Court · 1886
  3. Allen v. DodsonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1888
  4. Grimes v. ChamberlainNebraska Supreme Court · 1889
  5. Henkel v. BoudreauNebraska Supreme Court · 1911

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. BourdeauMontana Supreme Court · 1922

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API