Legal Opinion
Goldman v. Rio
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided May 19, 2009PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
*835In an action, inter alia, for an accounting, the plaintiff appeals (1), as limited by his brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Austin, J.), entered February 1, 2008, as granted the defendants’ motion, in effect, pursuant to CPLR 3211 (a) (3) and (7) to dismiss the complaint and denied that branch of his cross motion which was for summary judgment on the cause of action for an accounting, and (2) an order of the same court entered August 12, 2008, which denied his motion for leave to renew and reargue.
Ordered that the appeal from so much of the order entered…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- AHA Sales, Inc. v. Creative Bath Products, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2008
- Non-Linear Trading Co. v. Braddis Associates, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998
- Dynamics Corp. of America v. Marine Midland Bank-New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1987
- Palazzo v. PalazzoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1986
- Adam v. CutnerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Mills v. ChauvinAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013
- Goldman v. RioAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013
- Goldman v. RioAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013
- Mills v. ChauvinAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013