State v. Cady
Supreme Court of Vermont
1Opinion of the CourtLarrow, J.
Respondent was charged with operating a motor vehicle after his right or license to operate had been suspended by the Commissioner of Motor Vehicles, and before reinstatement, in violation of 23 V.S.A. § 674(a). The trial court found that respondent had never had a driver’s license, despite notices of purported suspension thereof issued by the District Court and by the Commissioner following a previous conviction for driving under the influence. It certified to us, before final judgment, two questions relating to the propriety of the charge and the procedures used in suspending for failure to…
2Cited by6 opinions
- Francis v. Municipality of AnchorageCourt of Appeals of Alaska · 1982
- State v. JarvisSupreme Court of Vermont · 1984
- State v. BowieSupreme Court of Kansas · 2000
- State v. PutnamSupreme Court of Vermont · 1979
- State v. CadySupreme Court of Vermont · 1978
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.