Legal Opinion
Roche v. State
Supreme Court of Delaware
Decided May 3, 1983PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MOORE, Justice:
James J. Roche appeals his conviction, following trial in the Superior Court, for driving a vehicle while under the influence of intoxicating liquor (21 Del.C. § 4177) (DUI). The sole issue raised by Roche is whether police officers, prior to administering intoximeter tests, must advise drivers that if they refuse to take a test, there are various procedural rights available to them before their licenses can be revoked. The trial judge held that it was sufficient to merely advise the suspect that if he did not submit to the test, his license would be revoked for a specified…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Schneckloth v. BustamonteSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- McMann v. RichardsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Bumper v. North CarolinaSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- South Dakota v. NevilleSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- McGautha v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Commonwealth, Aplt. v. Myers, D.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2017
- Commonwealth, Aplt. v. Myers, D.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2017
- Hearne v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 2017