Legal Opinion · Concurring in part, dissenting in part

Fuller-Ahrens Partnership v. S.C. Deparment of Highways & Public Transportation

Court of Appeals of South Carolina

Decided March 1, 1993No. 1966Published

1Concurring in part, dissenting in partCureton, Judge

The majority opinion is premised upon the view that FullerAhrens had constructive notice of the Department’s easement to install a 140' (length) by 18" (diameter) reinforced concrete pipe across the property of Fuller-Ahrens. The majority supports this holding by referring to the Department’s right-of-way deed which makes reference to the 1956 condemnation plans.

The law imputes to a purchaser of real estate notice of the recitals contained in any properly recorded writing which forms a link in his chain of title. Carolina Land Co. v. Bland, 265 S.C. 98, 107, 217 S.E. (2d) 16, 20 (1975); Moyle…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Baughman v. American Telephone & Telegraph Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1991
  2. Carolina Land Company, Inc. v. BlandSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1975
  3. City of Greenville v. Washington American League Baseball ClubSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1945
  4. Patellis v. TannerSupreme Court of Georgia · 1944
  5. Moyle v. CampbellSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1923

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API