Legal Opinion
Tummers v. Kleimack
Court of Customs and Patent Appeals
Decided February 24, 1972No. 8603PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Almond, Judge.
This is an appeal from the decision of the Patent Office Board of Patent Interferences, adhered to on reconsideration, awarding priority to appellees, Joseph J. Kleimack, Howard H. Loar, and Henry C. Theuerer (hereinafter Kleimack).
Appellant, Tummers, is involved on application serial No. 349,709 filed March 5, 1964 a division of application serial No. 84,923,1 filed January 25, 1961, and accorded the benefit of a January 29, 1960 foreign priority date.2 The Tummers’ application is assigned to North American Philips Co., Inc. The sole count in the interference was copied from…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- William S. Gubelmann, Deceased, by Walter S. Gubelmann v. Herman GangCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1969
- Robert L. Dreyfus and John W. Harrison v. Martin M. SternauCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1966
- Robert N. Noyce v. Jack St. Clair Kilby, Jack St. Clair Kilby v. Robert N. NoyceCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1970
- Hugh Wilma Boulton Reed and Alan John Wilkinson v. Erik Tornqvist and Arthur W. Langer, Jr.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1971
- Application of Wayne T. Barrett, Moises G. Sanchez and Milton C. VanikCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1971
3Cited by6 opinions
- Standard Oil Company v. MontedisonDistrict Court, D. Delaware · 1980
- In re EyndeCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1973
- Snitzer v. EtzelCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1976
- Stamicarbon, N.V. v. Chemical Construction Corp.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1976
- Kooi v. DeWittCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1976
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.