Legal Opinion

Large v. Clinchfield Coal Co.

Supreme Court of Virginia

Decided January 12, 1990No. Record 881163; Record 890009PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Whiting

In these two appeals, we decide whether the owners of the surface of a tract of real property are entitled to prohibit “longwall” coal mining. This coal mining method involves the removal of all the coal in a seam without leaving any supporting pillars of coal and results in a subsidence in the land surface.

Gerald and Betty Large own 81 acres of unimproved and uninhabited timberland in a mountainous area of Dickenson County. Clinchfield Coal Company (Clinchfield) owns the coal under the *14681 acres as the successor in title to parties who had acquired the coal from the Larges’s predecessors in…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. First Virginia Bank-Colonial v. BakerSupreme Court of Virginia · 1983
  2. Stone v. Ethan Allen, Inc.Supreme Court of Virginia · 1986
  3. Clinchfield Coal Corp. v. ComptonSupreme Court of Virginia · 1927
  4. Stonegap Colliery Co. v. HamiltonSupreme Court of Virginia · 1916
  5. Phipps v. LeftwichSupreme Court of Virginia · 1976

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Patel v. Comm'rUnited States Tax Court · 2012
  2. Jerry R. Ward Karen Ward v. Island Creek Coal Company Garden Creek Pocahontas Company Beatrice Pocahontas Coal CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1995
  3. Lee v. LemonSalem County Circuit Court · 2012
  4. Graham v. Island Creek Coal Co.District Court, W.D. Virginia · 2002
  5. Joshua Highlander v. Virginia Department of Wildlife ResourcesCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 2025

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API