Legal Opinion

Aiken v. Ceresini

District Court, D. Delaware

Decided May 16, 2024No. 1:23-cv-01126Unknown

1Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE _ RICHARD AIKEN, DO . Petitioner, : Vv. : Civil Action No. 23-1126-GBW SCOTT CERESINI, Warden, and : ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE: STATE OF DELAWARE, Jt Respondents. : MEMORANDUM OPINION Richard Aiken. Pro se Petitioner. May 16, 2024 Wilmington, Delaware {) p> Ay, NN, Williams, District Judge: Petitioner is proceeding pro se with a petition for federal habeas relief (“Petition”) which appears to be filed pursuant to

28 U.S.C. § 2254

(“Petition”). (D.I. 1; D.I. 3; see D.I. 4 at 1) For the reasons discussed, Petitioner is ordered to show…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  2. Lindh v. MurphySupreme Court of the United States · 1997
  3. McQuiggin v. PerkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 2013
  4. Ronald Jones v. Willis Morton, Warden of Trenton State Prison Attorney General of the State of New JerseyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1999
  5. Dale Swartz v. Meyers, Superintendent Pennsylvania Attorney GeneralCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2000

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API