Legal Opinion

Daly v. Chicago, Milwaukee & St. Paul Railway Co.

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided May 26, 1890PublishedCited by 7 opinions

Appeal by defendant, from an order of the district court for Big Stone county, G. L. Brown, J., presiding, refusing a new trial after verdict of $275 for plaintiff.

1Opinion of the Court

Vanderburgh, J.1

A locomotive with train of cars, passing over defendant’s road near plaintiff’s premises, set fire, as plaintiff alleges, to dry grass or combustible material near the track, which spread to plaintiff’s land, and destroyed certain, trees, for the value of which this action is brought. The negligence alleged is faulty and defective construction of the engine, and the. failure to provide it with modern *320appliances necessary to prevent sparks and fire escaping, and also negligent management. Upon the trial the testimony of the witness called by”the plaintiff to prove that the…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Searles v. . Manhattan Railway CompanyNew York Court of Appeals · 1886
  2. Karsen v. Milwaukee & St. Paul Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1881

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Chicago, St. P., M. & O. Ry. Co. v. BryantCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1895
  2. Dolph v. Lake Shore & Michigan Southern Railway Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1907
  3. Woodward v. Chicago, M. & St. P. Ry. Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1906
  4. Gulf, Colorado & Santa Fe Railway Co. v. Blakeney-Stevens-Jackson Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1908
  5. Rosen v. Chicago G. W. Ry. Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1897

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API