Legal Opinion

Woodward v. Chicago, M. & St. P. Ry. Co.

Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit

Decided April 25, 1906No. 2,307PublishedCited by 17 opinions

In Error to the Circuit Court of the United States for the District of Minnesota.

1Opinion of the Court

SANBORN, Circuit Judge.

This is an action against the railway-company for damages -for alleged negligence in the operation of one of its locomotives whereby the farm buildings of the plaintiff Woodward were burned. The main line of the defendant’s railroad between Minneapolis and Chicago ran within 150 feet of Woodward’s buildings. Between the railroad and the buildings there was a traveled highway. On the afternoon of May 1, 1900, after an engine of the defendant drawing a regular passenger train of eight cars had passed southeasterly along the railroad, a fire, which subsequently consumed…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Patton v. Texas & Pacific Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1901
  2. Randall v. Baltimore & Ohio RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1883
  3. Spaulding v. Chicago & Northwestern Railway Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1872
  4. Karsen v. Milwaukee & St. Paul Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1881
  5. Spaulding v. Chicago & Northwestern Railway Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1873

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Cupples Co. Manufacturers v. National Labor Relations BoardCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1939
  2. Canadian Northern Ry. Co. v. SenskeCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1912
  3. Scarpelli v. Washington Water Power Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1911
  4. New Amsterdam Casualty Co. v. FARMERS'CO-OP. UNIONCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1924
  5. McClendon v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1916

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API