Legal Opinion

Lippert v. Gates

New York County Courts

Decided October 15, 1911PublishedCited by 1 opinion

Actioet for partition.

1Opinion of the CourtTaylor, J.

This is- a partition action. Hr. Hahl purchased at the sale under the final judgment and paid ten per cent, of the bid, down. The plaintiff now makes a motion to compel him to complete his purchase by paying balance due. The purchaser advances many reasons why the title is not good, and why, therefore, he should not be compelled to complete. Some of these objections I deem unimportant. However, there are several which deserve attention, as follows:(1) When a guardian was appointed for infant defendants, the order did not provide for the filing of a bond pursuant to our Code of Civil…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Croghan v. . LivingstonNew York Court of Appeals · 1858
  2. Wilde v. JenkinsNew York Court of Chancery · 1834
  3. Gardner v. LukeNew York Supreme Court · 1835
  4. Jennings v. JenningsThe Superior Court of New York City · 1855
  5. Noble v. CromwellNew York Court of Appeals · 1860

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Noethinger v. JeffriesNew York Supreme Court · 1919

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API