Legal Opinion

Katz Park Avenue Corp. v. Jagger

New York Court of Appeals

Decided October 23, 2008PublishedCited by 25 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Smith, J.

We hold that, at least in the absence of unusual facts, a foreign national who is in the United States on a tourist visa cannot meet the “primary residence” requirement of New York City’s rent regulations.

Defendant’s landlord brought this ejectment action to remove her from a rent stabilized apartment in Manhattan. The landlord alleged that “the Premises are not occupied ... as the Tenant’s primary residence.” In support of a motion for summary judgment, the landlord submitted photocopies of pages from defendant’s passport, showing that she is a British citizen…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Emay Properties Corp. v. NortonAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1987
  2. Katz Park Avenue Corp. v. JaggerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2007

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. Ansonia Associates Ltd. Partnership v. UnwinAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2015
  2. Matter of Georgetown Unsold Shares, LLC v. LedetAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2015
  3. 68-74 Thompson Realty, LLC v. McNallyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2010
  4. Garced v. Clinton Arms AssociatesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2009
  5. Bonadio v. BonadioAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2021

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API