Legal Opinion

Van Harken v. City of Chicago

District Court, N.D. Illinois

Decided November 6, 1995No. 94 C 6502PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

SHADUR, Senior District Judge.

Ada Van Harken, Alex French and Michael Bennett, both individually and as class representatives, have brought suit against the City of Chicago (“City”), charging that City’s Administrative Adjudication of Parking Violations Ordinance (the “Ordinance,” Chicago Municipal Code of 1990 1 §§ 9-100-010 et seq.) violates the Due Process Clauses of both the United States and Illinois Constitutions. Plaintiffs assert their federal claims under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (“Section 1983”) and their state law claims under the supplemental jurisdiction…

2Cases cited28 opinions

  1. Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  2. Mathews v. EldridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  3. In Re WINSHIPSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  4. Mullane v. Central Hanover Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
  5. Parratt v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 1981

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Ada Van Harken v. City of ChicagoCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1997
  2. DeSantis v. Hafner Creations, Inc.District Court, E.D. Virginia · 1996
  3. Shavitz v. City of High PointDistrict Court, M.D. North Carolina · 2003
  4. Van Harken v. City of ChicagoAppellate Court of Illinois · 1999
  5. Hughes v. City of Cedar RapidsDistrict Court, N.D. Iowa · 2015

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API