Legal Opinion
Birmingham Realty Co. v. Crossett
Supreme Court of Alabama
Decided December 13, 1923No. 6 Div. 886PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtThomas, J.
A fireman for the city of Birmingham having received an injury caused by negligence on the part of the driv er of an automobile bus of a transportation company, obtained judgment, which was affirmed in Norwood Transportation Co. v. Crossett, 207 Ala. 222, 92 South. 461. Execution issued on this judgment was levied on the property of that transportation company, which was claimed by this respondent as mortgagee. The judgment of affirmance against the transportation company was on February. 9, 1922, and on March 14th the instant suit was filed. In response to demurrer the bill was last amended…
2Cases cited46 opinions
- Northern Securities Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1904
- Peterson v. Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1907
- Union Pacific Railway Co. v. Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1896
- Lehigh Mining & Manufacturing Co. v. KellySupreme Court of the United States · 1895
- In re Watertown Paper Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1909
41 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Krivo Industrial Supply Company and Morgan Precision Parts, Inc. v. National Distillers and Chemical CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1973
- Forest Hill Corp. v. Latter & Blum, Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1947
- C. E. Development Company v. KitchensSupreme Court of Alabama · 1972
- Ex Parte BakerSupreme Court of Alabama · 1983
- BROADMOOR RLTY., INC. v. First Nationwide BankSupreme Court of Alabama · 1990
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.