In re: William David Goldstein and Molly K. Goldstein
United States Bankruptcy Appellate Panel for the Ninth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
TAYLOR, Bankruptcy Judge.
INTRODUCTION
Appellants, chapter 7 1 debtors William David Goldstein and Molly K. Goldstein, appeal the bankruptcy court’s order authorizing the chapter 7 trustee to compromise and sell, as property of the chapter 7 estate, four state court claims filed by the Goldsteins in postpetition litigation. We conclude that the bankruptcy court did not err when it held that the claims at issue were property of the estate that could be compromised or sold, and we AFFIRM.
FACTUAL BACKGROUND AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY
A. Events preceding the Goldsteins’ bankruptcy filing
Like many…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- United States v. Whiting Pools, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Padgett v. WrightCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009
- Wigod v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2012
- Jolly v. Eli Lilly & Co.California Supreme Court · 1988
- In Re E.R. Fegert, Inc., Debtor. Dan O'rourke, Trustee v. Seaboard Surety Company Coral Construction Company, Inc. Shotwell Paving CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1989
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Porrett v. Hillen (In re Porret)District Court, D. Idaho · 2016
- In re BoltonUnited States Bankruptcy Court, D. Idaho · 2018
- Arnot v. Endresen (In re Endresen)United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Oregon · 2015
- In re PorrettUnited States Bankruptcy Court, D. Idaho · 2016
- In re CarrollUnited States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. California · 2018
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.