Legal Opinion

Circle Chevrolet Co. v. Giordano, Halleran & Ciesla

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided August 1, 1995Published

1Opinion of the Court

142 N.J. 280 (1995)

662 A.2d 509

CIRCLE CHEVROLET COMPANY, A NEW JERSEY CORPORATION, AND THOMAS J. DEFELICE, SR., PLAINTIFFS-APPELLANTS,

v.

GIORDANO, HALLERAN & CIESLA, A PROFESSIONAL CORPORATION, DEFENDANT-THIRD-PARTY PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT,

v.

PETRICS, MESKIN, NASSAUR & DAMBACH, ACCOUNTS AND AUDITORS, THIRD-PARTY DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT.

The Supreme Court of New Jersey.

Argued March 28, 1995.

Decided August 1, 1995.

Ronald L. Lueddeke argued the cause for appellants.

Richard L. Friedman argued the cause for respondent Giordano, Halleran & Ciesla, etc. (Giordano, Halleran & Ciesla, attorneys; Mr. Friedman,…

Also in this document: Dissent.

2Cases cited34 opinions

  1. Lopez v. SwyerSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1973
  2. Cogdell v. Hospital Center at OrangeSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1989
  3. DiTrolio v. AntilesSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1995
  4. Crispin v. Volkswagenwerk, A.G.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1984
  5. Burd v. New Jersey Telephone CompanySupreme Court of New Jersey · 1978

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API