Legal Opinion

Rosario v. Ercole

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Decided August 10, 2010No. 08-5521-prPublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

Following disposition of this appeal on April 12, 2010, petitioner-appellant Richard Rosario filed a petition for rehearing and rehearing in banc. Upon consideration by the panel that decided the appeal, the petition for rehearing is DENIED. An active judge requested a poll on whether to rehear the case in banc. A poll *684having been conducted and there being no majority favoring in banc review, rehearing in banc is hereby DENIED.

Judge Wesley concurs in an opinion joined by Judges Cabranes, Raggi, Hall, and Livingston; Judge Katzmann concurs in a separate opinion; Chief Judge Jacobs…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. People v. TurnerNew York Court of Appeals · 2005
  2. Rosario v. ErcoleCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2010
  3. People v. OzunaNew York Court of Appeals · 2006
  4. People v. McNeillAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2010

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. People v. GarciaNew York Supreme Court · 2010
  2. Jackson v. ConwayDistrict Court, W.D. New York · 2011
  3. People v. HaywardNew York Court of Appeals · 2024
  4. Rosario v. ErcoleCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2010

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API