People v. Ozuna
New York Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Memorandum.
The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed.
Defendant Beato Ozuna was convicted of first-degree criminal contempt, but acquitted of first-degree rape. The complainant, his former girlfriend, testified that while defendant was in jail following his arrest for rape, he had telephoned her repeatedly despite an order of protection forbidding contact. Defendant testified on his own behalf. He disputed the rape, and claimed that he had telephoned complainant only because she had appealed to his father to ask him to do so. According to defendant, each time…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- People v. CabanNew York Court of Appeals · 2005
- People v. TurnerNew York Court of Appeals · 2005
- People v. FordNew York Court of Appeals · 1979
3Cited by44 opinions
- Rosario v. ErcoleCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2010
- People v. GeorgiouAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2007
- People v. DombrowskiAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011
- People v. AshleyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2010
- People v. SmithAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013
39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.