Legal Opinion

Lamm v. Watson

District Court, District of Columbia

Decided December 23, 1955No. Civ. A. 4201-53, 4202-53PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

McGARRAGHY, District Judge.

These are two cases brought under Title 35 United States Code, § 145, as enacted July 19, 1952. Civil Action No. 4201-53 is brought for the purpose of obtaining allowance of Claims 16, 17 and 19 of Patent Application Serial No. 96,-155 of Raymond R. Lamm and The Patent and Licensing Corporation, Assignee, Plaintiffs. Civil Action No. 4202-53 is brought for the purpose of obtaining allowance of Claims 14 through 20, inclusive, of Patent Application Serial No. 96,156 of Raymond R. Lamm and The Patent and Licensing Corporation, Assignee, Plaintiffs.

Both cases present a…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. In Re Gebauer-FuelneggCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1941
  2. United States Rubber Co. v. MarzallDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1950

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Leutzinger v. LaddDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1963
  2. Robert C. Watson, Commissioner of Patents v. Frederick C. Bersworth and the Dow Chemical CompanyCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1958
  3. Robert C. Watson, Commissioner of Patents v. Frederick C. Bersworth and the Dow Chemical CompanyCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1958

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API