Legal Opinion

Leutzinger v. Ladd

District Court, District of Columbia

Decided October 18, 1963No. Civ. A. 3115-61Published

1Opinion of the Court

JACKSON, Judge.

This civil action was filed pursuant to the provisions of Title 35 U.S.C. § 145 seeking judgment authorizing the defendant, Commissioner of Patents, to issue letters patent to plaintiff containing Claims 1 to 9, inclusive, of an application Serial No. 468,784, filed November 15, 1954, entitled “A Composition Stick for Filling Small Regular Cavities”.

The Examiner rejected Claims 1 to 9, inclusive, as being based on an inadequate disclosure. He also rejected dependent Claims 7 to 9 as being improper since they defined the composition stick in terms of its process of manufacture.…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Application of John A. Nelson and Anthony C. ShabicaCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1960
  2. In Re Gebauer-FuelneggCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1941
  3. Lamm v. WatsonDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1955

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API