Ponticello v. County of Suffolk
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the Court
It is settled that when "an employer and a union enter into a collective bargaining agreement that creates a grievance procedure, an employee subject to the agreement may not sue the employer directly for breach .of that agreement but must proceed, through the union, in accordance with the contract” (Matter of Board of Educ. v Ambach, 70 NY2d 501, cert denied sub nom. Margolin v Board of Educ., 485 US 1034; see also, Matter of Biegel v Board of Educ., 211 AD2d 969; Miller v County of Broome, 197 AD2d 170; Goldstein v Tabb, 177 AD2d 470, 471; Matter of Boags v Port Auth., 162 AD2d 245).…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Board of Education v. AmbachNew York Court of Appeals · 1987
- Smith v. SipeNew York Court of Appeals · 1986
- Goldstein v. TabbAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1991
- Kleinmann v. BachAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1993
- Tomlinson v. Board of Education of Lakeland Central School District of Shrub OakAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1996
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Saidin v. New York City Department of EducationDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2007
- Martin v. State University of New YorkDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2010
- Cunningham v. Local 30, International Union of Operating EngineersDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2002
- Ledain v. Town of OntarioNew York Supreme Court · 2002
- Spano v. Kings Park Central School DistrictAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2009
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.