Legal Opinion

Merritt v. Richey

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided October 11, 1884No. 11,407PublishedCited by 10 opinions

From the Clinton Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the Court

Best, C.

The appellant brought this action against the appellees to set aside a sheriff Is sale of his property.

A demurrer by James M. Richey was sustained to bis amended complaint, and this ruling presents the only question in the record.

The complaint averred, in substance, that David P. Barner, on the 31st day of May, 1877, recovered in the Clinton Circuit Court a judgment against Marcellus Bristow for $178.64; that at that time said Bristow was the owner in fee simple of more than thirty distinct parcels of land in said county, each. *237of which is described, and all of which became subject to…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Day v. PattersonIndiana Supreme Court · 1862
  2. Houston v. HoustonIndiana Supreme Court · 1879
  3. Sidener v. WhiteIndiana Supreme Court · 1874
  4. Harmon v. State ex rel. PeltonIndiana Supreme Court · 1882

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Cockrum v. WestIndiana Supreme Court · 1889
  2. Richey v. MerrittIndiana Supreme Court · 1886
  3. Ritter v. CostIndiana Supreme Court · 1883
  4. Bank of Commerce v. First National BankIndiana Supreme Court · 1898
  5. Chapin v. McLarenIndiana Supreme Court · 1886

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API