Legal Opinion

United States v. Maryland & Virginia Milk Producers Ass'n

District Court, District of Columbia

Decided December 2, 1949No. Cr. No. 294-48PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HOLTZOFF, District Judge.

In this prosecution for alleged violátion of the Sherman law, 15 U.S.C.A. § 1 et seq., the defendants have applied for a subpoena duces tecum directing the Government to produce for the defendants’ inspection all documents which the Government has obtained from any person who is not a party to this proceeding. In other words, the defendants seek a broad discovery of all documentary evidence that the Government has obtained in support of its case, with the exception of such material as is covered by the recently coined and apt term of “work product” of a lawyer.

Defendan…

2Cited by20 opinions

  1. United States v. Van AllenDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1961
  2. United States v. PeltzDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1955
  3. Fryer v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1953
  4. United States v. CarterDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1954
  5. United States v. MesaroshDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1952

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API