Legal Opinion
United States v. Mesarosh
District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania
Decided October 10, 1952No. Cr. 13531PublishedCited by 24 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
STEWART, District Judge.
The six defendants in this case were indicted for conspiracy to commit offenses against the United States prohibited by the Smith Act, 18 U.S.C. § 2385. Two of the defendants are represented by counsel and four are not as yet. Motions have been filed by counsel on behalf of the particular defendants they represent, but as we stated at the time of the oral argument all motions have been considered as filed on behalf of all defendants to the extent appropriate. In all, twenty-two pre-trial motions have 'been filed and argued in this case. They fall into nine general…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- Glasser v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
- Nardone v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1939
- Dennis v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1951
- Thiel v. Southern Pacific Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1946
- Smith v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by24 opinions
- State v. BellSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1975
- Clifford Jones v. Honorable Oliver Gasch, Judge of the United States District Court for Thedistrict of ColumbiaCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1968
- United States v. MargesonDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1966
- United States v. PeltzDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1955
- Harriet Dow, Administratrix of the Estate of Paul Dow, Deceased v. Carnegie-Illinois Steel CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1955
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.