Legal Opinion

Lesser v. Lesser

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided June 4, 1986No. 31152; CA A29502Published

1Opinion of the CourtNewman, J.

Appellant sought partition of a farm that she held in co-tenancy with her former husband.1 ORS 107.105(6). The co-tenancy was created by a dissolution judgment. See Lesser and Lesser, 28 Or App 377, 559 P2d 532, rev den (1977). She appeals from the trial court’s judgment that partitioned the farm and awarded her damages of $5,596.74. Our review is de novo. Brusco v. Brusco, 241 Or 550, 555, 407 P2d 645 (1965). We modify the judgment and affirm as modified.

Appellant assigns error to the court’s computation of damages. The parties agree that respondent is liable to her for one-half of the fair…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Palmer v. ProtrkaOregon Supreme Court · 1970
  2. Dahlhammer & Roelfs v. SchneiderOregon Supreme Court · 1953
  3. Brusco v. BruscoOregon Supreme Court · 1965
  4. Miller v. PleinOregon Supreme Court · 1951
  5. In re the Marriage of LesserCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1977

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API