Legal Opinion

Kohler v. United Irr. Co.

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided May 12, 1920No. 6394PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMoursund, J.

On April 14, 1919,. George W. Kohler and many others filed a. petition in the district court of Hidalgo county,- and that the petitoiners owned land, con-pany. They alleged that the said company-owned an irrigation system in Hidalgo county, and that the petitioners owned land, contiguous and adjacent to the canals and laterals, and had for several years irrigated with water from said system; that in addition they own and hold rights under certain water contracts, providing for compensation to-the company by means of a flat rate, to be collected from all who hold contracts, without regard to…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Daniels v. TearneySupreme Court of the United States · 1880
  2. Great Falls Manufacturing Co. v. Attorney GeneralSupreme Court of the United States · 1888
  3. Wall v. Parrot Silver & Copper Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1917
  4. State v. Boston & Maine RailroadSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1909
  5. Knight v. OldhamCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1919

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Gulf Refining Co. v. BoninCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1922
  2. Becton v. DublinCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1942
  3. Burgess v. American Rio Grande Land & Irrigation Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1927
  4. Stuart v. NorvielArizona Supreme Court · 1924
  5. Texas Water Rights Commission v. City of DallasCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1979

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API