De Lee v. Hicks
Nevada Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
*463OPINION
By the Court,
Thompson, J.:
This action was commenced by Linda Hicks against Sol De Lee to recover the amounts due upon two promissory notes. The district court entered summary judgment for Hicks. Error is claimed since, in the view of De Lee, genuine issues of material fact are disclosed by the record and should be litigated.
Two promissory notes were executed by De Lee in favor of Gale Hicks, Trustee. The first note dated June 3, 1973, was for $68,000 with interest at 12 percent per year. The second note dated July 23, 1973, was for $19,000 with interest at 12 percent per year.
In…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Pease v. TaylorNevada Supreme Court · 1972
- Carson Meadows Incorporated v. PeaseNevada Supreme Court · 1975
- Miller v. YorkNevada Supreme Court · 1976
- United Mortgage Co. v. HildrethNevada Supreme Court · 1977
- Muscelli v. MuscelliNevada Supreme Court · 1980
3Cited by5 opinions
- Dahl v. DahlUtah Supreme Court · 2015
- Diane, Inc. v. KapnisonNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1983
- Dahl v. DahlUtah Supreme Court · 2015
- Dahl v. DahlUtah Supreme Court · 2015
- Mapes v. Palo Alto Town & Country Village, Inc.District Court, D. Nevada · 1984