Legal Opinion

Mapes v. Palo Alto Town & Country Village, Inc.

District Court, D. Nevada

Decided May 2, 1984No. CV-R-82-200-ECRPublished

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM DECISION AND ORDER

EDWARD C. REED, Jr., District Judge.

Defendant has moved for summary judgment on the ground that an amendment to Nevada’s usury statute permits the parties to agree on any rate of interest, thus negating the material contention of Plaintiffs that the promissory note here involved is usurious. It is Defendant’s position that the amendment must be given retroactive effect.

The promissory note is dated April 15, 1980, and is secured by a deed of trust of the same date. The statute (NRS 99.050) then in effect limited to 18 percent per annum the rate of interest that…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Ewell v. DaggsSupreme Court of the United States · 1883
  2. Collins v. Union Federal Sav. & Loan Ass'nNevada Supreme Court · 1983
  3. Circus Circus Hotels, Inc. v. WitherspoonNevada Supreme Court · 1983
  4. Holloway v. BarrettNevada Supreme Court · 1971
  5. Studebaker Bros. Co. of Utah v. WitcherNevada Supreme Court · 1921

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API