Horlick v. Swoboda
Wisconsin Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtNelson, J.
The appealing defendants contend that the circuit court erred both in overruling the demurrer to the complaint and in denying their motion to quash the temporary injunction or, in the alternative, to increase the amount of the bond furnished by the plaintiff. In our opinion the important and fundamental question for determination is whether the court erred in overruling' the defendants’ de- • murrer to the complaint. In support of the assertion that the court erred in refusing to quash the temporary injunction, the defendants make substantially the same argument as that made in support of…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- State ex rel. Willis v. PrinceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1878
- Tainter v. LucasWisconsin Supreme Court · 1872
- Kasik v. JanssenWisconsin Supreme Court · 1914
- State ex rel. Davern v. RoseWisconsin Supreme Court · 1909
- Sedgwick v. BlanchardWisconsin Supreme Court · 1916
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- McCarthy v. SteinkellnerWisconsin Supreme Court · 1937
- Baraboo National Bank v. CorcoranWisconsin Supreme Court · 1943
- Clear Channel Outdoor, Inc. v. City of MilwaukeeCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2011
- G. M. C. Hotels, Inc. v. HansonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1940